I've been running Meta ads for a SaaS product - an AI SEO tool aimed at small businesses and Shopify stores. After spending around six thousand euros over three months, the campaigns just hit a wall. At first we optimised for 'Start Trial' - got a decent number of trial starts, but many of those cards bounced when the subscription hit. Then a Meta marketing pro advised switching to 'Subscribe/Purchase'. That worked for a short burst, then performance fell off a cliff - 'Low Results' everywhere. Switched back to trial optimisation, and now that's barely firing either. Latest week: about €450 spend, two trial starts, one paying customer. All told, Meta has brought in maybe eight customers, most stuck around for a month or two. Not dead, but clearly broken.
Meta support now suggests something different: run a Traffic campaign (€40/day) with ad sets for landing page views and link clicks, plus an Awareness campaign (€25/day) optimised for reach. Don't touch anything for two weeks, then improve creatives. Their reasoning: cheaper traffic feeds the pixel more data, which eventually leads to better conversions.
To me this feels like the classic 'buy cheap traffic to warm the pixel' advice that works for impulse-buy ecom, not for a SaaS product that needs 3-5 months to show value. When your audience is price-sensitive small businesses, cheap clicks bring people who aren't ready to wait for an ROI. The macro picture is tough - inflation is squeezing those same businesses. Pushing them through a bottom-funnel offer with low-intent traffic seems backwards.
I'd rather fix the funnel tracking, improve the trial-to-paid conversion, and keep optimising for Purchase with better creatives. But with a daily budget of only €55-65, splitting it across traffic and awareness feels like spreading butter too thin.
Would any of you test that Meta support setup, or would you double down on purchase optimisations? What signals would you look at before deciding?