I love seeing real data from creators - it always cuts through the noise. A colleague recently shared 90 days of their LinkedIn analytics with me, and the pattern across their top posts was clearer than I expected. Here's what stood out:
1. Real-life photos performed best
Photos with family, clients, everyday moments - highest engagement and impressions by a wide margin. Not shocking in hindsight. LinkedIn heavily rewards content that feels socially authentic.
2. AI-generated 'status' images did well at first, then faded
Things like fake keynote photos, fake award shots. They got strong initial engagement because they trigger curiosity. But two things happened: impressions stayed capped by the platform, and engagement dropped as people started recognising the AI pattern. Novelty wears off fast once the audience catches on.
3. Educational carousels had the most stable reach
This format consistently pulled solid impressions - better than most other types they tested. Engagement was more moderate, but the floor was much higher and steadier. I've seen this pattern across multiple creator analytics, so it seems to generalise.
The takeaway from their data? Real photos build trust. AI fantasy images create temporary attention. Educational carousels create scalable distribution. The best strategy probably isn't picking one - it's combining them intentionally. People follow people, but they stay for useful ideas.