I've seen this pattern a hundred times. dev spends months building a product, launches, silence. then they post on a forum: "I need a marketing co-founder." Classic.
There's a community of 50+ solo builders floating around who are apparently all 'great at code, crap at distribution'. Someone's trying to match them with marketing people. Sounds noble, but let's be real - if these founders haven't figured out a single demand channel yet, they're not ready for a partner. They need someone who can turn the very first messy signal into repeatable distribution, not a free lifetime membership to yet another platform.
i get the appeal - equity gigs, portfolio work, collabs. But most of these 'marketing minds' get burned because there's no clear equity split or payment structure upfront. The two replies in the original thread nailed it: vet both sides, outline the deal, and stop romanticising the partnership.
If you're a growth person and you still want in, fine. but don't expect a broke founder to suddenly value your skill because they finally admitted they suck at outreach. if you join, demand clarity on the deal and a real matching process - not just an invite link and a promise of viral glory