There's a deeper pattern here that I've noticed across B2B workflows: the tools that survive are the ones that let you build a layer of interpretation on top of raw data. Manual reporting is a tax on time that compounds across projects. i looked into this same problem about six months back, because pulling reports for 20+ sites manually is just trading hours for spreadsheets.
Ended up on the SE Ranking API. not writing code-I used their native Looker Studio connector. You grab the API key, plug it into Looker, and it surfaces everything from position shifts to technical audit results. Once the dashboard is set, clients see live numbers, I just add commentary. That alone cut my reporting time by about 70%.
For deeper analysis-say, competitor monitoring-I bridged it via Make into Google Sheets. that setup automatically pulls the top 10 results for a keyword list and flags anomalies or new entrants. No code, full automation. Covers maybe 90% of my monitoring and reporting needs.
so the question becomes: are you after a flashy dashboard for client-facing polish, or actual data that needs to be crunched in ways the interface doesn't allow? The difference changes which tool makes sense.