hard agree, but let's tighten the targeting criteria. GBP is basically a zero-friction landing page for in-market local searchers-reviews, click-to-call, directions. For a plumber or emergency locksmith, that's often higher intent than a generic landing page. The CTR difference alone can justify the test.
Where most people screw up: they send broad, cold traffic there and wonder why CPA skyrockets. That's a mismatch of intent. GBP works when the query already signals "I need this now and nearby." For anything requiring comparison, trust building, or retargeting-landing page every time.
Couple of things I'd add to your caution list:
- Never send paid traffic to GBP if you rely on UTM-tagged call tracking for offline conversion attribution-GBP calls strip that data.
- Always A/B test GBP vs a dedicated landing page with the same ad copy before scaling. I've seen GBP outperform on impression share but underperform on actual lead quality.
Default split I run: hyper-local, high-intent campaigns (radius < 10 miles, modifiers like "near me" or "now") → GBP. everything else (service comparison, brand building, retargeting) → landing page with a clear CTA and lead capture. keeps CPCs from bleeding out.